Le 11 juillet 2022 à 01:17:32 :
Le 11 juillet 2022 à 00:54:20 :
L’auteur raconte n’importe quoi dès le premier point, cf. les commentaires de Lénine et son explicitation de la différence entre égalité formelle bourgeoise et égalité réelle, que Marx relève déjà, en termes élogieux, chez Babeuf, dans ses études sur la révolution française
N’écoutez pas ce furoncle communiste qu’est l’auteur
Le mensonge fait partie de leur doctrine
Bronstein et Alinski l’ont écrit, mais Lénine l’a écrit aussi
Petits porcins vient couiner.
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/19/5/1652468584-leninhaha.png
On va citer directement Engels dans ses correspondances sur la Critique du Programme de Gotha :
The removal of all social and political inequality is also a very questionable phrase in place of "the abolition of all class differences." Between one country and another, one province and another and even one place and another, there will always exist a
certain inequality in the conditions of life, which can be reduced to a minimum but never entirely removed. Mountain dwellers will always have different conditions of
life from those of people living on plains. The idea of socialist society as the realm of equality is a one-sided French idea resting upon the old liberty, equality, fraternity' ? an idea which was justified as a stage of development in its own time and place, but
which, like all the one-sided ideas of the earlier socialist schools, should now be over come, for they only produce confusion in people's heads and more precise modes of presentation have been found.
Dans “Anti-Dühring” :
The demand for equality has arisen as a reaction against the bourgeois demand for equality, drawing more or less correct and morefar reaching demands from this bourgeois demand, and serving as an agitational means in order to stir up the workers against the capitalists with the aid of the capitalists own assertions! and in this case it stands or falls with bourgeois equality itself. In both cases the real content of the proletarian demand for equality is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity
On va aussi citer Lénine :
Peasants! Unmask the wolves in sheep’s clothing who praise “freedom”, “equality”, and “unity of labour democracy” and thereby actually champion the “freedom” of the landowner to oppress the peasants, the “equality” of the wealthy capitalist and the worker or the semi-starved peasant, the “equality” of the well-fed man who hides his surplus grain and the worker who is tormented by hunger and unemployment because the country has been ruined by war. Such wolves in sheep’s clothing are the working people’s worst enemies; whether they call themselves Mensheviks, Socialist-Revolutionaries, or non-party they are in reality friends of the capitalists.
[…]
Only the corrupt heroes of the corrupt Berne or yellow International, people like Kautsky, Martov and Co., can evade examination of the concrete forms, conditions, and tasks of this alliance by resorting to platitudes about “freedom”, “equality”, and “unity of labour democracy”, that is, by snatching fragments from the ideological baggage of the era of commodity economy.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/jun/23.htm
Pour le marxisme : l’égalité réelle, c’est l’abolition des classes. Ça n’a rien à voir avec l’égalitarisme, idéologie nécessairement naïve, déconnectée de la méthode d’analyse qu’est le marxisme et qui ne résiste pas à l’épreuve du réel.
Dispose, petit porcin.
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/19/5/1652468584-leninhaha.png
Navrant + gênantes les sources en anglais, on voit tout de suite que t’as jamais lu les livres et que tu viens frénétiquement de faire une recherche Google en espérant prouver que j’ai tort. Je devine que la sueur suinte encore de ton clavierhttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/52/2/1545694093-bartch.png
Le 11 juillet 2022 à 01:17:32 :
Le 11 juillet 2022 à 00:54:20 :
L’auteur raconte n’importe quoi dès le premier point, cf. les commentaires de Lénine et son explicitation de la différence entre égalité formelle bourgeoise et égalité réelle, que Marx relève déjà, en termes élogieux, chez Babeuf, dans ses études sur la révolution française
N’écoutez pas ce furoncle communiste qu’est l’auteur
Le mensonge fait partie de leur doctrine
Bronstein et Alinski l’ont écrit, mais Lénine l’a écrit aussi
Petits porcins vient couiner.
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/19/5/1652468584-leninhaha.png
On va citer directement Engels dans ses correspondances sur la Critique du Programme de Gotha :
The removal of all social and political inequality is also a very questionable phrase in place of "the abolition of all class differences." Between one country and another, one province and another and even one place and another, there will always exist a
certain inequality in the conditions of life, which can be reduced to a minimum but never entirely removed. Mountain dwellers will always have different conditions of
life from those of people living on plains. The idea of socialist society as the realm of equality is a one-sided French idea resting upon the old liberty, equality, fraternity' ? an idea which was justified as a stage of development in its own time and place, but
which, like all the one-sided ideas of the earlier socialist schools, should now be over come, for they only produce confusion in people's heads and more precise modes of presentation have been found.
Dans “Anti-Dühring” :
The demand for equality has arisen as a reaction against the bourgeois demand for equality, drawing more or less correct and morefar reaching demands from this bourgeois demand, and serving as an agitational means in order to stir up the workers against the capitalists with the aid of the capitalists own assertions! and in this case it stands or falls with bourgeois equality itself. In both cases the real content of the proletarian demand for equality is the demand for the abolition of classes. Any demand for equality which goes beyond that, of necessity passes into absurdity
On va aussi citer Lénine :
Peasants! Unmask the wolves in sheep’s clothing who praise “freedom”, “equality”, and “unity of labour democracy” and thereby actually champion the “freedom” of the landowner to oppress the peasants, the “equality” of the wealthy capitalist and the worker or the semi-starved peasant, the “equality” of the well-fed man who hides his surplus grain and the worker who is tormented by hunger and unemployment because the country has been ruined by war. Such wolves in sheep’s clothing are the working people’s worst enemies; whether they call themselves Mensheviks, Socialist-Revolutionaries, or non-party they are in reality friends of the capitalists.
[…]
Only the corrupt heroes of the corrupt Berne or yellow International, people like Kautsky, Martov and Co., can evade examination of the concrete forms, conditions, and tasks of this alliance by resorting to platitudes about “freedom”, “equality”, and “unity of labour democracy”, that is, by snatching fragments from the ideological baggage of the era of commodity economy.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1919/jun/23.htm
Pour le marxisme : l’égalité réelle, c’est l’abolition des classes. Ça n’a rien à voir avec l’égalitarisme, idéologie nécessairement naïve, déconnectée de la méthode d’analyse qu’est le marxisme et qui ne résiste pas à l’épreuve du réel.
Dispose, petit porcin.
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/19/5/1652468584-leninhaha.png
Navrant + gênantes les sources en anglais, on voit tout de suite que t’as jamais lu les livres et que tu viens frénétiquement de faire une recherche Google en espérant prouver que j’ai tort. Je suite que la sueur suinte encore de ton clavierhttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/52/2/1545694093-bartch.png
et quitter l'Union européenne et l'euro avec
