AYAAAA le TIMES révèle que l'OMS est CORROMPUE
This prompted an outburst from the appreciative Chinese delegate to the board. Li Song, an ambassador to the UN, leapt to his feet and denounced countries that were blocking the entry of travellers from Hubei, the province of which Wuhan is the capital. “All these measures are seriously against recommendation by the WHO,” he fumed.
In fact, while the health agency did later give advice that travellers should be screened to detect flu symptoms at airports, it never did explicitly support any restrictions on travel to and from China. By the end of March 2020 many countries across the world had ignored the health agency’s advice and instituted some form of travel ban.
Gostin believes China’s cover-up in January was “the singular important event in the course of the pandemic” because it blew the world’s “only shot” of containing the crisis at source.
C'est chaud, un ambassadeur des nations unies a même dénoncé les pays qui refusait les voyageurs venant de la province du Hubei car "c'était contre les recommandations de l'OMS" 
Je n'en peux plus de ce monde de merde.
Peu à peu, les complotistes sont en train de nous montrer qu'ils ont raison depuis le début. Ca fait froid dans le dos.
J'ai beaucoup de mal à avaler ma redpill 
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:29:35 :
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:27:15 :
La Chine ne fait même pas parti des 20 pays contribuant le plus à l'OMShttps://www.who.int/about/funding/contributors
Les USA financent 10 fois plus l'OMS que la Chine (850 millions de dollars par an comparé à 80 millions) et c'est la Chine qui a l'OMS dans la poche? Mais bien sûr
C'est pas l'OMS dans sa totalité mais surtout le directeur général de l'OMS si j'ai bien compris.
Le directeur est un pantin, la Chine a exercé le rôle qu'on lui a laissé
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:24:54 :
Le 14 août 2021 à 20:04:16 :
Donc je me suis vacciné pour rien ?https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/15/3/1586339427-wupongo.jpg c’est acté depuis le premier jour ayo
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/51/2/1607997474-ayaoo.png Le 14 août 2021 à 21:27:21 :
Professor Richard Ebright, of Rutgers University’s Waksman Institute of Microbiology in New Jersey, a fellow of the Infectious Disease Society of America, believes China’s influence over the WHO played “a decisive role” in the agency’s failure to act decisively at the start of the pandemic.
“Not only did it have a role; it has had a decisive role,” he said. “It was the only motivation. There was no scientific or medical or policy justification for the stance that the WHO took in January and February 2020. That was entirely premised on maintaining satisfactory ties to the Chinese government. So at every step of the way, the WHO promoted the position that was sought by the Chinese government ... the WHO actively resisted and obstructed efforts by other nations to implement effective border controls that could have limited the spread or even contained the spread of the outbreak.”
He added: “It is impossible for me to believe that the officials in Geneva, who were making those statements, believed those statements accorded with the facts that were available to them at the time the statements were made.
“It’s hard not to see that the direct origin of that is the support of the Chinese government for Tedros’s election as director-general ... This was a remarkably high return on [China’s] investment with the relatively small sums that were invested in supporting his election. It paid off on a grand scale for the Chinese government.”
David Fidler, a former WHO legal adviser, is scathing about Tedros’s “obsequious” praise for Xi and suspects that “the WHO knew China was not being transparent, particularly about information related to human-to-human transmission”. He added: “The praise that he heaped on China gave them no incentive to change their behaviour.”
Tedros finally declared an international public health emergency on January 30. By then the virus had been detected in 18 countries and was almost certainly lurking undetected in many others.
''''The WHO’s failure to act had blown the world’s only chance to contain the pandemic at source, Ebright believes. “Ironically, China’s success in curbing the spread and containing the spread by implementing appropriate border controls ... tells us that, had this been done globally, in January, this outbreak could have been potentially contained,” he said.
On aurait pu contenir l'épidémie mais les liens entre le directeur général de l'OMS et la Chine ont fait que l'on n'a pas fait les bons choix
Sauf que les dirigeants des autres pays n’en étaient pas capables non plus, c’était plus important d’aller au théâtre et de laisser les matchs de football se faire.
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:35:00 :
Je n'en peux plus de ce monde de merde.Peu à peu, les complotistes sont en train de nous montrer qu'ils ont raison depuis le début. Ca fait froid dans le dos.
J'ai beaucoup de mal à avaler ma redpill
Les nuances ça vous parle ? On est pas dans un combat à qui détiendra « la verité unique » entre « le complotiste » et « le golem ».
If the cordial relationship between Tedros and China had survived the opening months of the pandemic, the strength of their friendship would be tested once again in the early summer of 2020. It was over the very important, yet highly sensitive, issue of how and where the virus originated.
The Sars outbreak in 2003 is thought to have originated in bats in Yunnan province, southwest China, and to have been introduced into markets in the surrounding area through an intermediary host animal. Sars-CoV-2 is believed to have had similar beginnings because of its resemblance to other bat coronaviruses.
However, the caves in Yunnan province are more than a thousand miles from Wuhan, and no bats containing such viruses have ever been found near that city. If an intermediate animal, or indeed a human, had been infected by a bat in Yunnan, how could this very infectious virus be carried on such a long journey to Wuhan without causing a single noticeable outbreak along the way?
The Chinese had tested thousands of animals in Wuhan and the surrounding areas, but not one had come up positive for the virus. Chinese scientists had also rejected the suggestion that the virus entered through the Huanan seafood market in the city, which was connected to some of the cases in December 2019.
Extensive sample-testing at the market failed to show a link between any of the animals there and the virus. It was also clear that many of the early human cases had no link to the market, and the conclusion was that the market was a crowded environment in which the virus had spread, rather than the point of introduction into Wuhan.
But there was an elephant in the room. Coronaviruses found in the Yunnan bat caves, including the world’s closest known match to Sars-CoV-2, were being kept at the Wuhan Institute of Virology at the time of the outbreak. To many it seemed a remarkable coincidence that, of all the 600 cities in China, the virus began in Wuhan, the home of an institute that houses the world’s largest collection of coronaviruses from wild bats and has a team of scientists who often travel to those same Yunnan caves.
The scientists had been seeking out coronavirus-infected bats and then transporting the viruses back to the laboratory in Wuhan. There they carried out highly controversial “gain of function” experiments to make the viruses more infectious to humans. The work was designed to help develop vaccines to pre-empt a potential coronavirus outbreak, but many scientists had warned that one safety lapse could itself cause a deadly pandemic.
Only a tiny handful of labs in the world carried out such high-risk experiments, and in 2018 inspectors sent by the US embassy in Beijing to the Wuhan institute had flagged serious safety concerns there. A US diplomatic cable leaked to The Washington Post stated: “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”
There were therefore questions about whether the pandemic had been caused by a leak from the Wuhan institute or one of its researchers who had been infected in the bat caves and then accidentally carried the virus back to the city. It was certainly not inconceivable: the Sars virus had leaked from the National Institute of Virology lab in Beijing in 2004. Nine people were infected by the outbreak and one died.
There were serious concerns about what the Wuhan institute had been doing with the world’s closest known match to the Covid-19 virus, which was the strongest lead in the hunt for the pandemic’s origin. It had been found eight years ago by Wuhan scientists in an abandoned mine, where it had been linked to deaths caused by a coronavirus-type respiratory illness. But the significance of the deaths had been kept secret by the Chinese authorities until a Sunday Times investigation uncovered them in the summer of last year. The lab has refused to answer questions on whether it was experimenting on the virus in the run-up to the pandemic.
Indeed China had been reluctant to address many questions about the pandemic’s origins since January 2020, other than to issue blanket denials. It did not want the ignominy of being found culpable for the world’s worst pandemic for a century.
Le Times qui va se retrouver suicidé
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:37:26 :
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:24:54 :
Le 14 août 2021 à 20:04:16 :
Donc je me suis vacciné pour rien ?https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/15/3/1586339427-wupongo.jpg c’est acté depuis le premier jour ayo
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2020/51/2/1607997474-ayaoo.png Le 14 août 2021 à 21:27:21 :
Professor Richard Ebright, of Rutgers University’s Waksman Institute of Microbiology in New Jersey, a fellow of the Infectious Disease Society of America, believes China’s influence over the WHO played “a decisive role” in the agency’s failure to act decisively at the start of the pandemic.
“Not only did it have a role; it has had a decisive role,” he said. “It was the only motivation. There was no scientific or medical or policy justification for the stance that the WHO took in January and February 2020. That was entirely premised on maintaining satisfactory ties to the Chinese government. So at every step of the way, the WHO promoted the position that was sought by the Chinese government ... the WHO actively resisted and obstructed efforts by other nations to implement effective border controls that could have limited the spread or even contained the spread of the outbreak.”
He added: “It is impossible for me to believe that the officials in Geneva, who were making those statements, believed those statements accorded with the facts that were available to them at the time the statements were made.
“It’s hard not to see that the direct origin of that is the support of the Chinese government for Tedros’s election as director-general ... This was a remarkably high return on [China’s] investment with the relatively small sums that were invested in supporting his election. It paid off on a grand scale for the Chinese government.”
David Fidler, a former WHO legal adviser, is scathing about Tedros’s “obsequious” praise for Xi and suspects that “the WHO knew China was not being transparent, particularly about information related to human-to-human transmission”. He added: “The praise that he heaped on China gave them no incentive to change their behaviour.”
Tedros finally declared an international public health emergency on January 30. By then the virus had been detected in 18 countries and was almost certainly lurking undetected in many others.
''''The WHO’s failure to act had blown the world’s only chance to contain the pandemic at source, Ebright believes. “Ironically, China’s success in curbing the spread and containing the spread by implementing appropriate border controls ... tells us that, had this been done globally, in January, this outbreak could have been potentially contained,” he said.
On aurait pu contenir l'épidémie mais les liens entre le directeur général de l'OMS et la Chine ont fait que l'on n'a pas fait les bons choix
Sauf que les dirigeants des autres pays n’en étaient pas capables non plus, c’était plus important d’aller au théâtre et de laisser les matchs de football se faire.
Ben c'est en partie à cause des communiqués de l'OMS en fait.
En gros, si j'ai bien compris, vu que l'OMS semblait cool à ce niveau, les autres pays ont pas réagi beaucoup plus que ça, se disant que c'était pas si grave ce qui pourrait arriver.
Je pense que le problème c'est que nos gouvernants prennent trop en considération ce type d'organisation extra gouvernementales.
Image résumant les faits 
En même temps quand tu vois que BUZIN a obtenu un poste à l'OMS après avoir admirablement géré la crise du covid
Ce qui me fait chier, c'est qu'on ne saura sûrement jamais d'où vient l'origine du COVID
Mais l'hypothèse d'une fuite de labo chinois est plus que possible si j'ai bien compris
Étonnant
Une pensée pour les golems vaccinés.
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:49:17 :
Ce qui me fait chier, c'est qu'on ne saura sûrement jamais d'où vient l'origine du COVIDMais l'hypothèse d'une fuite de labo chinois est plus que possible si j'ai bien compris
labo chinois avec des souches gérés au niveau international, les élites de Davos on en profité au moment où tout semblai indiquer une alliance avec la Chine (d'où le fait de nier cela au départ). Le virus a au départ été propagé artificiellement dans la plupart des pays avec différentes souche par les lobby en question. Ensuite est venue une fracture avec la Chine, du coup maintenant même les élites de Davos ne savent plus où guider le bateau.
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:54:03 :
Le 14 août 2021 à 21:49:17 :
Ce qui me fait chier, c'est qu'on ne saura sûrement jamais d'où vient l'origine du COVIDMais l'hypothèse d'une fuite de labo chinois est plus que possible si j'ai bien compris
labo chinois avec des souches gérés au niveau international, les élites de Davos on en profité au moment où tout semblai indiquer une alliance avec la Chine (d'où le fait de nier cela au départ). Le virus a au départ été propagé artificiellement dans la plupart des pays avec différentes souche par les lobby en question. Ensuite est venue une fracture avec la Chine, du coup maintenant même les élites de Davos ne savent plus où guider le bateau.
Ça viendrait d'un programme militaire chinois à la base selon l'article je crois et dès le début, Trump semble avoir accusé les chinois
API disponible. Utilisez le paramètre "api" en GET, peu importe le contenu, sur une page du site.
-
Partenaire: JVFlux
Ce site n'est pas associé à Jeuxvideo.com ou Webedia. Nous utilisons seulement des archives publiques.
Il est inutile de me spammer par e-mail pour supprimer un topic. Au contraire, en conséquence, je mettrais votre topic dans le bloc ci-dessous.
-
Personne n'a pas assumé de topic pour le moment.