bonjourcbonjour
2023-03-28 12:06:27
Citation de : A Scientific Inquiry Into the Validity of Astrology, McGrew and McFall, 1990
The results were clear-cut. Six expert astrologers failed to do significantly better than chance or than a nonastrologer control subject at matching birth information to the corresponding case materials for 23 individuals. The astrologers and control subject also did no better at the matching task than ten judges who attempted to rank order the ages of the 23 test cases solely on the basis of photographs. Astrologers' predictive accuracy was unrelated to their level of confidence in their predictions. Furthermore, there was little or no predictive agreement among the astrologers, even though the astrologers purported to be using the same system and methods to arrive at their predictions. Overall, the astrologers probably could have done just as well if they had matched the birth information with the case materials in a random manner.
oupsent
bonjourcbonjour
2023-03-28 12:11:20
Meta analyse sur l'astrologie.
https://www.astrology-and-science.com/d-meta2.htm
When applied to nearly 300 empirical astrological studies, many of them by astrologers, meta-analysis reveals zero support for effect sizes of around r = 0.7 that are representative of astrological claims [...] If you are looking for something where nothing is true and everything is permitted, then astrology seems to be an excellent choice.
Violent putain