Article intéressant et détaillé sur la nouvelle création de la CIA , en vue de la poursuite de la guerre internationale contre le terrorisme , après Al-Qaida, les « global white supremacist » , formé notamment en Ukraine :
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/ukraine-new-al-qaeda/
J’ai lu plusieurs fois ces histoires de bio labs américains en Ukraine et des documents disparus sur des sites gouvernementaux, sans passer vraiment de temps à vérifier cela.
Quelqu’un aurait des explications à ce sujet ?
Je poste un lien vers le document pdf préparé par le gouvernement russe concernant les crimes commis , selon lui , par les ukrainiens depuis 2014, publié hier par l’ambassade russe à Genève.
Attention , le document contient des images pouvant choquer.
https://archive.org/details/presentation-ukrainian-war-crimes
Selon le journal grec ci-dessous , les milices ukrainiennes empêchent par la force les civiles , notamment de nationalité grecque, de quitter les villes.
Des civils seraient abattus.
Je rappelle que cela était une tactique utilisée par les forces nazies durant la seconde guerre mondiale.
https://greekcitytimes.com/2022/03/01/greek-in-mariupol-fascist-ukrainian/?amp
Mexique déclare sa neutralité sur le conflit
Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador a déclaré qu'à rebours des Occidentaux, Mexico n'allait prendre aucune sanction économique contre Moscou, qui conduit une opération militaire en Ukraine. «Nous n'allons prendre aucune représailles de type économique, parce que nous devons maintenir de bonnes relations avec tous les gouvernements du monde. Et nous voulons être en mesure de pouvoir parler avec les parties en conflit», a déclaré sans ambages le président mexicain Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, lors de sa traditionnelle conférence de presse quotidienne le 1er mars.
Pour ceux que ça intéresse , je mets un poste qui explique les tactiques militaires russes , différentes des USA , qui peuvent montrer que les difficultés russes ne le sont pas vraiment :
-The number 1 takeaway so far that to me is the “theme” of this war: the entire West does not comprehend the complexity of Russian battle doctrine, nor is capable of understanding or mirroring it.
A little military back-history for those not familiar: the U.S. armed forces are a very slow, lethargic, and methodical army. American doctrine goes along the lines of a predictable, slow, careful/cautious computer. They move huge bulky forces whose vehicles are extremely slow, setup massive foreward bases and then wait for airpower to first level everything ahead of them, and only THEN continue onward. This is exemplified for instance during 2003 Iraq invasion when, a week or two into their slow trudge towards Bagdad, they actually took a big “tactical pause” where they ceased all advancement in order to let its slow lumbering forces catch up and regroup.
U.S. doctrine with special forces is such that they are a very proportionally small group of specialists used only for specific/precise small sabotage operations, whereas the vast bulk of the combat is done by the heavyset army which has to really “plant its feet” and “dig in” in order to be effective, and does not move or advance without every t being crossed and i dotted, airforce having fully cleared the path etc. American combined arms capabilities are extremely low, everything is done in the manner of “one thing at a time”, which is why you never see training footage of American exercises with combined arms whereas Russia is world famous for its huge scale exercises (like Zapad 2021 etc) where landing ships, helicopters, airforce, army, navy, tanks, etc all work together simultaneously in rapid advancement, interlinking their data and capabilities.
For those that don’t know, the Soviets invented the concept of “deep battle” which later inspired (read: was ripped off by) the Germans in their “Blitzkrieg”. The idea was first invented by Russia which means Russian forces have had the doctrine of agility and battle behind enemy lines the longest of any other armed forces/country on earth. If you’re not familiar please read up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_operation
Now, what does this mean: Russian military doctrine differs from the slow, ponderous, methodical and lumbering American military behemoth which does not move or conduct any advancement until all its forces are perfectly dug in and calibrated. Russian forces are much more agile, and rely much more on airborne and light advance units that can go behind enemy lines and disrupt command formations, supply trains etc. The most notable example of this difference is, like I mentioned before, U.S. special operations forces operate in very small picked groups, whereas Russian “Spetsnaz” and VDV forces are numbered in the tens of thousands and regularly conduct entire large scale operations on their own. See the most famous example for context https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Storm-333 You will never see an american equivalent where almost 1,000 Navy Seals storm a giant palace on their own. This is a major doctrinal difference.
The U.S. and West do not have the capability to drop the types of large scale mobile and highly agile units deep into enemy lines, or penetrate thereof. They can do small platoons of Seals by Blackhawk to take out a tower, but not several thousands of VDV racing across the country with swift light / amphibious vehicles, BMD’s etc.
So my point in this is that, what U.S. analysts, including top military “experts” are witnessing in Ukraine has them completely frazzled and perplexed. They are not even capable of comprehending the type of deep battle and agile tactics that Russia is utilizing. The strategy is in fact of a ‘creative’ and highly advanced nature simply not possible in the U.S. armed forces. The extreme operational speed that Russian mobile units are utilizing in racing past enemy lines, then enveloping their cities while capturing rear echelon units, destroying supply/command, etc., is simply unthinkable and impossible in the U.S. military doctrinal space. So when these Western ‘experts’ view these actions they resort to a strange cognitive dissonance and various psychological biases which force them to make excuses and completely flawed analyses.
The fact of the matter is, Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, much larger than anything U.S. has ever invaded in fact. 50% larger than Iraq, (and double the population), double the size of Vietnam, double the size of Germany. And Russian forces in only a matter of days are already all over the country, penetrating swiftly and deeply to its interior. Granted they haven’t captured the deepest interior portions yet, but that goes to my point which so flummoxes western analysts, is they’re incapable of understanding the maneuvers of forces which do not necessarily aim to capture everything. The speed and agility of Russian ‘deep battle’ systems sends enemies into disarray, confusing their commands, destroying internal/rear strategic points, etc.
In summary: the sheer “creativity”, agility, and complexity of Russia’s current incursion is too baffling and advanced for any Western ‘expert’ to properly understand or analyze. They are only used to the one dimensional, lumbering and methodical American operations doctrines which rely heavily on massive carpet bombing of all civilian infrastructure for the sluggish and leaden-footed main force to advance, until they can once again dig in and “pause” for a long time to concentrate on the next enemy battle grouping in the same predictable, methodical manner. Sorry, this simply isn’t how Russia operates.
Now with that said, this method does have some drawbacks, so I’ll speak on those now.
In my analysis (as other experts have agreed recently) yes Russia HAS stretched itself a tad thin with these methods, but this is accepted risk they are taking and not some sort of “accident” they found themselves in. They are exchanging time for other resources. For instance, one of the reasons we’re seeing such light assaults on cities like Kharkov is because as of yet, Russia does not have the full manpower to make an overpowering infantry assault on the city.
The main reason for this is because for now Russia has only committed roughly 35-50k troops to Ukraine out of the reported 150-180k they have stationed and ready right outside the Ukr borders. This is also done deliberately. In Georgia 2008 they also came in with a much smaller force first of 10-15k then gradually poured in more until there were 30-40k or more. Reports last night/today claimed that Russia will now be sending the 2nd wave of another 50k or so troops, so this may begin a new phase of besieging the currently surrounded major cities like Kharkov and Mariupol.
For comparison purposes, Ukraine is said to have its most crack / elite / veteran troops in the Donbas region, and roughly ~100k of them. So let’s say Russia has used only 40-50k forces so far. Logic dictates the largest batch would be around Kiev the capital. We know for a fact a large amount is also in the southern Kherson push, aiming to cap that city and push west to Odessa. Then we know a large amount also is in the Mariupol theatre. So let’s just say for argument’s sake there’s 10k around Kiev, 10k for Kherson, 10k for Mariupol and 10k in Kharkov region. Clearly you can see, 10k for Kharkov is not quite sufficient for a Ukie holdout force of 100k spread all over the region. Sure DNR/LNR are there as well but they are operationally limited to what their objectives are and I’m not sure they’re even allowed to participate in Kharkov’s capture, and they don’t have much troops to begin with compared to these other numbers as I understand it (maybe 20-30k? possibly much less? I’ll have to confirm).
So yes as you can start to visualize from this, the current phase of Russian operations does not really allow for the full capture of these major cities. It has been focused on surrounding and using the misunderstood and unequaled agility/deep penetration of Russian forces to disrupt and weaken the enemy’s lines/supplies/command structure all over the country. Only when reinforcements are confirmed to start arriving will we likely see true sieges and attempts to liberate the major population centers.
One last note: the other misunderstood factor of a force that relies on such complex/mobile tactics is the fact that Russian forces utilize a lot of ‘testing’ attacks where they are able to test the defenses of an entrenched enemy, while staying “light on their feet”. This includes pulling in and out with quick strikes at different weak points not only to soften the defense up, but to confuse them (make their forces constantly have to redistribute to different vectors of defense), and also test the defensive responses. American forces are incapable of this and thus their experts/generals are likewise incapable of analyzing these maneuvers. In the eyes of the American generals/analysts, they misunderstand the tactics and end up concluding “the Russians keep retreating! What are they doing? They strike Kiev’s gates then pull out. Putin is unhinged! His military is failing! Blah blah.” This is the type of hysterical nonsense I’m hearing from western “experts” because their own systems do not allow for such mobility. Russian units are like ghosts capable of appearing at your gates, attacking, then disappearing without losses. You can see evidence of this in the dozens of videos we have of Russian forces zipping around the country at incredible speed. There’s videos of light armor/truck columns just speeding down highways around the country to create these bursts of initiative to completely confound the enemy. The other drawback of course to this is, that sometimes they move SO fast that they are leaving behind lost rear units, or they move so “creatively” and on the fly to new objectives that miscalculations occur in regards to supplies and a tank or two might run out of fuel on the way there as we’ve seen in some of the videos. These are calculated costs, the Russian generals know the risks and know these are the drawbacks to these methods, but there are huge rewards and advantages to them which the Russian forces are reaping which go completely over the Western analysts head. To them, all they see is a chaotic mess of units spread thin, zipping around the country directionless simply because their own forces have never been capable of such doctrines and their overladen, sluggishly designed equipment is not capable of even conducting it (think of the massive, slow American medium armor units that crawl around Iraq and are sitting ducks). Everything in the American armor category is designed doctrinally to be much larger, more armored, but far slower and sluggish. Think of the Abrams, Bradleys, MRAPS etc which are all double the size of Russian tanks, BTR’s, and Gaz Tigr equivalent vehicles and go at half the speed. You can see easy evidence of this in the rash of videso published last year from Syria where Russian light/medium patrol vehicles squared off against their American equivalents, ramming and racing them. In every video, the Russians won and there were several recorded instances where the American vehicles flipped or got stuck in mud, incapable of keeping up with the Russian equivalents.
Just look at these poorly designed, non-rugged, slow and sluggish lumbering pieces of crap try to keep up with superior Russian equipment. In the words of Biden, “Come on, man!”
Please try not to laugh!