Messages de RisiRaoult
JE DEVIENS ZINZIN
ZINZIN
Mais qui VOTE POUR CA BORDEL POURQUOI VOUS REAGISSEZ PAS LES GAUCHISTES VOUS COMPTEZ ALLER JUSQUOU DANS LA FOLIE ?
Le 24 août 2022 à 03:22:57 :
J'ai lu tout le topic et écouté la vidéo hallucinante posté par l'op.C'est absolument consternant de voir qu'il y a un forumer sur 4 qui est ok avec ça. Vous défendez ce type juste parce que c'est votre couleur politique. Si vous ne trouvez pas qu'il va trop loin en expliquant qu'il faut perturber la production alimentaire, quand jugerez vous qu'ils vont trop loin?
Il va etre temps de faire une introspection, ce partie est ses millitants, c'est à dire vous les 25% n'ont plus aucun contact avec la réalité. Vous votez ce n'est pas anodin, si nous suivons M.Bayou des gens vont mourir. Vraiment mourir. Je ne comprends pas qu'ils soit nécessaire de vous expliquer cette réalité aussi basique. Et quelque soit les solutions proposées il faut le faire AVANT de stopper le pompage AVANT sinon des gens vont mourir de faim.
Il va etre temps de se montrer responsable et de dire adieu à ce partie ou au moins faire remonter les problèmes
C'est votre taf les millitants plutot que de défendre l’innommable,et essayer de remettre la faute sur la droite macron zemmour, non il n'y a qu'un seul fautif dans cette affaire et c'est vous.
Prenez vos responsabilités et dites ouvertement à vos cadres qu'ils ont perdu l'esprit. Sinon c'est etre complice des conséquences.
C'est bien résumé en effet
Mais COMMENT PEUT ON EN ARRIVER LA BON SANG
Ils me rendent fou putain c'est pas possible d'en arriver là comment se fait ils qu'ils fassent plus de 1% aux elections
Le 13 août 2022 à 14:51:21 :
Le 13 août 2022 à 14:49:11 :
Le 13 août 2022 à 14:47:57 :
Vous pensez vraiment que ces 4 branleurs ont apporté la violence en Grèce ?https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/27/4/1530827992-jesusreup.png Ahï les golems
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/27/4/1530827992-jesusreup.png Mettre quelqu'un dans le coma et manquer de le tuer = branleur pour la gauche
Changez rien
Je suis déjà allé à Toumba à Thessalonique voir le PAOK, les mecs ont tous des couteaux dans les poches pour se battre avec l'adversaire
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/27/4/1530827992-jesusreup.png Dring dring c'est la société mondiale qu'est violente, pas seulement ces connards de région parisienne
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/27/4/1530827992-jesusreup.png
Regardez les banaliser une tentative de meurtre.
Que vous faut il de plus pour prendre la mesure du péril de la gauche?
Le 17 juin 2022 à 13:59:14 :
Le 17 juin 2022 à 13:56:24 :
Sur la partie 5) c'est quoi les soluces pour que se soit le plus doux possible pour les pauvres?Et bien l'enjeu c'est d'augmenter l'offre donc tout ce qui motivera à l'augmenter sera bon pour la situation.
Après tu peux donner des aides aux pauvres le temps que l'offre et la demande se rééquilibre pourquoi pas mais le point clé c'est absolument de faire monter l'offre et le spéculateur à cet effet là lorsqu'il prend un pari à la hausse
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/26/7/1530476579-reupjesus.png Ce que je voulais surtout souligner c'est que le controle des prix à l'effet inverse, non seulement tu ne corrige pas le problème mais tu l'aggrave. En gros tu améliore la situation à très court terme mais tu l'aggrave à horizon de quelques mois
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/26/7/1530476579-reupjesus.png
Et si l'état prete des terres gratos aux paysans pour qu'ils augmentent leur prod c'est une solution?
Le 17 juin 2022 à 13:47:48 :
Merci mon clé j'étais tombé tes topics, du bon taf ça fait plaisir
Idem
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:55:23 :
Les gauchistes ont DDB l'opax ayaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa je vois que sortir des sources et expliquer un problème est un acte inacceptablehttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2016/26/1467335935-jesus1.png
Raid flood attaque de site
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:35:51 :
le truc c'est que je suis trop con pour comprendre les programmes, la refléxion que tu as ici, moi je l'ai surtout toute les propositions de tout les programmes des différents parti. Donc toi tu fais comment pour voter?
Se dire que peut etre la plus value ne tombe pas du ciel
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:40:03 :
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:35:47 :
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:32:18 :
Dimanche, c'est cash in the NUPES en dépit des larmes de l'auteur macroniste.Aucun argument evidemment
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/25/2/1529422413-risitaszoom.png Tu es étonné ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/26/7/1530476579-reupjesus.png
Non
Le 14 juin 2022 à 14:32:18 :
Dimanche, c'est cash in the NUPES en dépit des larmes de l'auteur macroniste.
Aucun argument evidemment
Le 03 juin 2022 à 18:02:59 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:54:05 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:40:11 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:35:24 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:34:08 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:31:16 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:29:08 :
Je suis chofa et je vais voter nupes pour faire chier macron et accélérer le naufrage de ce trou à merde qui nous sert de paysQuelle autre alternative sérieuse à part NUPES ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Les républicains nous la mettent depuis des années et lâchent tout dès que Macron les appelle
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png N'importe qu'elle autre partie Macron, Pecresse, NDA, Phillipot, Zemmour, MLP.
Il n'y a aucun partie qui nous fera subir une telle catastrophe que NUPES.
S'ils passent vous aurez mini 6 mois peut etre 1 an pour vous expat le temps que les effets délétères de ces actions surviennent.
Sauf si vous etes au RSA bien sur mais meme la préparez vous au ticket de rationnement s'il va jusqu'au bout.
Programme validé par des universitaires et économistes
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png
A contrario de la réforme des retraites à 65anshttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Sur les loyers :
One common example of a price ceiling is rent control. In many cities, the local government places a ceiling on rents that landlords may charge their tenants. The goal of this policy is to help the poor by making housing more affordable. Economists often criticize rent control, arguing that it is a highly inefficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living. One economist called rent control “the best way to destroy a city, other than bombing.”
The adverse effects of rent control are less apparent to the general population because these effects occur over many years. In the short run, landlords have a fixed number of apartments to rent, and they cannot adjust this number quickly as market conditions change. Moreover, the number of people searching for housing in a city may not be highly responsive to rents in the short run because people take time to adjust their housing arrangements. Therefore, the short-run supply and demand for housing are both relatively inelastic.
Panel (a) of Figure 3 shows the short-run effects of rent control on the housing market. As with any binding price ceiling, rent control causes a shortage. But because supply and demand are inelastic in the short run, the initial shortage caused by rent control is small. The primary result in the short run is a reduction in rents.
The long-run story is very different because the buyers and sellers of rental housing respond more to market conditions as time passes. On the supply side, landlords respond to low rents by not building new apartments and by failing to maintain existing ones. On the demand side, low rents encourage people to find their own apartments (rather than living with roommates or their parents) and induce more people to move into the city. Therefore, both supply and demand are more elastic in the long run.
Panel (b) of Figure 3 illustrates the housing market in the long run. When rent control depresses rents below the equilibrium level, the quantity of apartments supplied falls substantially and the quantity of apartments demanded rises substantially. The result is a large shortage of housing.
In cities with rent control, landlords use various mechanisms to ration housing.
Some landlords keep long waiting lists. Others give preference to tenants without
children. Still others discriminate on the basis of race. Sometimes apartments are
allocated to those willing to offer under-the-table payments to building superintendents.
In essence, these bribes bring the total price of an apartment closer to the
equilibrium price.To fully understand the effects of rent control, recall one of the Ten Principles of Economics from Chapter 1: People respond to incentives. In free markets, landlords try to keep their buildings clean and safe because desirable apartments command higher prices. But when rent control creates shortages and waitinglists, landlords lose their incentive to respond to tenants’ concerns. Why should a landlord spend money to maintain and improve the property when people are waiting to move in as it is? In the end, tenants get lower rents, but they also get lower-quality housing.
Policymakers often react to the adverse effects of rent control by imposing additional regulations. For example, various laws make racial discrimination in housing illegal and require landlords to provide minimally adequate living conditions. These laws, however, are difficult and costly to enforce. By contrast, without rent control, such laws are less necessary because the market for housing is regulated by the forces of competition. In a free market, the price of housing adjusts to eliminate the shortages that give rise to undesirable landlord behavior.
Source Greogry Mankiw Principle of Economics p113-114Sur les prix :
The costs of controls were not as obvious as their benefits (a fact,
incidentally, which explains a good deal of their popularity), but the
economic historian must nevertheless estimate how great they were.
There are four major costs to consider: (1) the size of the bureaucracies
that had to be created to administer controls, (2) the damage they caused
to economic efficiency, (3) the black markets that arose in response to
controls, and (4) the additional burdens placed on our political institutions
and labor relations. In the experiences we have examined, costs in all
of these areas were heavy
Source Rockoff Drastic Measures A history of Wage and Control price p.236Bonne chance mon petit je regarderai ça de loin
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png En gros les seuls appart qui seront valable seront ceux ou tu dois payer une rallonge en liquide si je pige bien ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/39/3/1506524542-ruth-perplexev2.png Ca fait bien sur partie des problèmes mais s'il n'y avait que celui ci ahi. Comme le texte le dit (developpement du marché noir, manque de logement, baisse de la qualité, baisse de la sécurité, discriminations, augmentation de la bureaucratie et donc des couts)
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png Bref on a à la fois le théorique et des historiens economiques qui ont travaillés spécifiquement sur ces questions ils sont UNANIMES
On a meme posé des question à des economistes seul 1% pensent que le controle des loyer est une bonne idée https://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/rent-control/
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png Que tu sois proprio ou locataire quoi qu'il arrive tu va morfler
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png Mais la chance que tu aurras c'est que tu aurras un an probablement avant que ça chauffe le temps que l'offre devienne élastique donc en cas d'election NUPES faudra pas trainer pour vendre ses actifs Français et s'expat
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png Bonne chance à eux
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png
Donc en tant que locataire j'aurai un effet latance ?
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:56:06 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:54:05 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:40:11 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:35:24 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:34:08 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:31:16 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:29:08 :
Je suis chofa et je vais voter nupes pour faire chier macron et accélérer le naufrage de ce trou à merde qui nous sert de paysQuelle autre alternative sérieuse à part NUPES ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Les républicains nous la mettent depuis des années et lâchent tout dès que Macron les appelle
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png N'importe qu'elle autre partie Macron, Pecresse, NDA, Phillipot, Zemmour, MLP.
Il n'y a aucun partie qui nous fera subir une telle catastrophe que NUPES.
S'ils passent vous aurez mini 6 mois peut etre 1 an pour vous expat le temps que les effets délétères de ces actions surviennent.
Sauf si vous etes au RSA bien sur mais meme la préparez vous au ticket de rationnement s'il va jusqu'au bout.
Programme validé par des universitaires et économistes
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png
A contrario de la réforme des retraites à 65anshttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Sur les loyers :
One common example of a price ceiling is rent control. In many cities, the local government places a ceiling on rents that landlords may charge their tenants. The goal of this policy is to help the poor by making housing more affordable. Economists often criticize rent control, arguing that it is a highly inefficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living. One economist called rent control “the best way to destroy a city, other than bombing.”
The adverse effects of rent control are less apparent to the general population because these effects occur over many years. In the short run, landlords have a fixed number of apartments to rent, and they cannot adjust this number quickly as market conditions change. Moreover, the number of people searching for housing in a city may not be highly responsive to rents in the short run because people take time to adjust their housing arrangements. Therefore, the short-run supply and demand for housing are both relatively inelastic.
Panel (a) of Figure 3 shows the short-run effects of rent control on the housing market. As with any binding price ceiling, rent control causes a shortage. But because supply and demand are inelastic in the short run, the initial shortage caused by rent control is small. The primary result in the short run is a reduction in rents.
The long-run story is very different because the buyers and sellers of rental housing respond more to market conditions as time passes. On the supply side, landlords respond to low rents by not building new apartments and by failing to maintain existing ones. On the demand side, low rents encourage people to find their own apartments (rather than living with roommates or their parents) and induce more people to move into the city. Therefore, both supply and demand are more elastic in the long run.
Panel (b) of Figure 3 illustrates the housing market in the long run. When rent control depresses rents below the equilibrium level, the quantity of apartments supplied falls substantially and the quantity of apartments demanded rises substantially. The result is a large shortage of housing.
In cities with rent control, landlords use various mechanisms to ration housing.
Some landlords keep long waiting lists. Others give preference to tenants without
children. Still others discriminate on the basis of race. Sometimes apartments are
allocated to those willing to offer under-the-table payments to building superintendents.
In essence, these bribes bring the total price of an apartment closer to the
equilibrium price.To fully understand the effects of rent control, recall one of the Ten Principles of Economics from Chapter 1: People respond to incentives. In free markets, landlords try to keep their buildings clean and safe because desirable apartments command higher prices. But when rent control creates shortages and waitinglists, landlords lose their incentive to respond to tenants’ concerns. Why should a landlord spend money to maintain and improve the property when people are waiting to move in as it is? In the end, tenants get lower rents, but they also get lower-quality housing.
Policymakers often react to the adverse effects of rent control by imposing additional regulations. For example, various laws make racial discrimination in housing illegal and require landlords to provide minimally adequate living conditions. These laws, however, are difficult and costly to enforce. By contrast, without rent control, such laws are less necessary because the market for housing is regulated by the forces of competition. In a free market, the price of housing adjusts to eliminate the shortages that give rise to undesirable landlord behavior.
Source Greogry Mankiw Principle of Economics p113-114Sur les prix :
The costs of controls were not as obvious as their benefits (a fact,
incidentally, which explains a good deal of their popularity), but the
economic historian must nevertheless estimate how great they were.
There are four major costs to consider: (1) the size of the bureaucracies
that had to be created to administer controls, (2) the damage they caused
to economic efficiency, (3) the black markets that arose in response to
controls, and (4) the additional burdens placed on our political institutions
and labor relations. In the experiences we have examined, costs in all
of these areas were heavy
Source Rockoff Drastic Measures A history of Wage and Control price p.236Bonne chance mon petit je regarderai ça de loin
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png En gros les seuls appart qui seront valable seront ceux ou tu dois payer une rallonge en liquide si je pige bien ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/39/3/1506524542-ruth-perplexev2.png Il spam un néolibéral mais me parle de sélection naturelle
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020416-1.png
Sur quoi tu te base pour dire que le raisonnement est faux car tu lui as répondu avec les retraites alors que ça parle controle des loyers
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:40:11 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:35:24 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:34:08 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:31:16 :
Le 03 juin 2022 à 17:29:08 :
Je suis chofa et je vais voter nupes pour faire chier macron et accélérer le naufrage de ce trou à merde qui nous sert de paysQuelle autre alternative sérieuse à part NUPES ?
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Les républicains nous la mettent depuis des années et lâchent tout dès que Macron les appelle
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png N'importe qu'elle autre partie Macron, Pecresse, NDA, Phillipot, Zemmour, MLP.
Il n'y a aucun partie qui nous fera subir une telle catastrophe que NUPES.
S'ils passent vous aurez mini 6 mois peut etre 1 an pour vous expat le temps que les effets délétères de ces actions surviennent.
Sauf si vous etes au RSA bien sur mais meme la préparez vous au ticket de rationnement s'il va jusqu'au bout.
Programme validé par des universitaires et économistes
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png
A contrario de la réforme des retraites à 65anshttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2022/22/2/1654020619-1.png Sur les loyers :
One common example of a price ceiling is rent control. In many cities, the local government places a ceiling on rents that landlords may charge their tenants. The goal of this policy is to help the poor by making housing more affordable. Economists often criticize rent control, arguing that it is a highly inefficient way to help the poor raise their standard of living. One economist called rent control “the best way to destroy a city, other than bombing.”
The adverse effects of rent control are less apparent to the general population because these effects occur over many years. In the short run, landlords have a fixed number of apartments to rent, and they cannot adjust this number quickly as market conditions change. Moreover, the number of people searching for housing in a city may not be highly responsive to rents in the short run because people take time to adjust their housing arrangements. Therefore, the short-run supply and demand for housing are both relatively inelastic.
Panel (a) of Figure 3 shows the short-run effects of rent control on the housing market. As with any binding price ceiling, rent control causes a shortage. But because supply and demand are inelastic in the short run, the initial shortage caused by rent control is small. The primary result in the short run is a reduction in rents.
The long-run story is very different because the buyers and sellers of rental housing respond more to market conditions as time passes. On the supply side, landlords respond to low rents by not building new apartments and by failing to maintain existing ones. On the demand side, low rents encourage people to find their own apartments (rather than living with roommates or their parents) and induce more people to move into the city. Therefore, both supply and demand are more elastic in the long run.
Panel (b) of Figure 3 illustrates the housing market in the long run. When rent control depresses rents below the equilibrium level, the quantity of apartments supplied falls substantially and the quantity of apartments demanded rises substantially. The result is a large shortage of housing.
In cities with rent control, landlords use various mechanisms to ration housing.
Some landlords keep long waiting lists. Others give preference to tenants without
children. Still others discriminate on the basis of race. Sometimes apartments are
allocated to those willing to offer under-the-table payments to building superintendents.
In essence, these bribes bring the total price of an apartment closer to the
equilibrium price.To fully understand the effects of rent control, recall one of the Ten Principles of Economics from Chapter 1: People respond to incentives. In free markets, landlords try to keep their buildings clean and safe because desirable apartments command higher prices. But when rent control creates shortages and waitinglists, landlords lose their incentive to respond to tenants’ concerns. Why should a landlord spend money to maintain and improve the property when people are waiting to move in as it is? In the end, tenants get lower rents, but they also get lower-quality housing.
Policymakers often react to the adverse effects of rent control by imposing additional regulations. For example, various laws make racial discrimination in housing illegal and require landlords to provide minimally adequate living conditions. These laws, however, are difficult and costly to enforce. By contrast, without rent control, such laws are less necessary because the market for housing is regulated by the forces of competition. In a free market, the price of housing adjusts to eliminate the shortages that give rise to undesirable landlord behavior.
Source Greogry Mankiw Principle of Economics p113-114Sur les prix :
The costs of controls were not as obvious as their benefits (a fact,
incidentally, which explains a good deal of their popularity), but the
economic historian must nevertheless estimate how great they were.
There are four major costs to consider: (1) the size of the bureaucracies
that had to be created to administer controls, (2) the damage they caused
to economic efficiency, (3) the black markets that arose in response to
controls, and (4) the additional burdens placed on our political institutions
and labor relations. In the experiences we have examined, costs in all
of these areas were heavy
Source Rockoff Drastic Measures A history of Wage and Control price p.236Bonne chance mon petit je regarderai ça de loin
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2017/02/1484173541-cc-risitas596.png
En gros les seuls appart qui seront valable seront ceux ou tu dois payer une rallonge en liquide si je pige bien ?
Bonjour Mr. Prats, quel est votre opinion sur le pass sanitaire/vaccinale?
En cas de retour voterez vous pour ou contre?