UK : 80% des personnes mortes du COVID étaient VACCINÉS

Il est où le uk ?

Le 10 octobre 2021 à 20:44:49 :

Le 10 octobre 2021 à 20:34:00 :

[20:32:06] <swieta1295>
Eh bah c'est un rapport accablant pour les pro vax. Mais bon apparemment faut toujours vacciner tout le monde

Ils vont t'expliquer qu'il y a plus de morts chez les vaccinés car il y en a beaucoup plus qui sont vaccinés que non-vaccinés... Sauf que le but de ce vaccin n'était pas de protéger les gens de la mort ?https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2018/49/4/1544084859-pottah1.png

Bah c'est simple

Le vaccin protège pas à 100%
Imaginons un pays avec 100% de la population vaccinée
Il y aura toujours des personnes hospitalisées malgré le vaccin puisque ce dernier ne protège pas à 100%
Il y aura donc 100% de vaccinés hospitalisés

Ne feedez pashttps://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2021/40/7/1633891774-1633754305621.jpg

https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
Page 24
L'arnaque du 95 % d'efficacité du vaccin. Le truc c'est qu'ils utilisent le RRR ( relative risk reduction ) et non pas l'ARR ( absolute risk reduction ) .
https://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2021/39/7/1633294630-capture-pfizer.jpg
Si vous regardez le tableau , le 95 % est obtenu en faisant 1-(8/162) = 1 - 0.049 = 0.950
Dans le groupe vacciné seulement 8 personnes sur 17411 ont contracter le covid. ( 8/17411 = 0.00046 , la proba de contracté le covid avec le vaccin est p = 0.00046 )
Dans le groupe placebo seulement 162 personnes sur 17511 ont contracter le covid. ( 162/17511 = 0.0093 , la proba de contracté le covid sans le vaccin est de 0.0093 )

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00069-0/fulltext

"Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines. However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines."

Deaths

"A total of six (2 vaccine, 4 placebo) of 43,448 enrolled participants (0.01%) died during the
reporting period from April 29, 2020 (first participant, first visit) to November 14, 2020 (cutoff
date). Both vaccine recipients were >55 years of age; one experienced a cardiac arrest 62 days
after vaccination #2 and died 3 days later, and the other died from arteriosclerosis 3 days after
vaccination #1. The placebo recipients died from myocardial infarction (n=1), hemorrhagic
stroke (n=1) or unknown causes (n=2); three of the four deaths occurred in the older group (>55
years of age). All deaths represent events that occur in the general population of the age groups
where they occurred, at a similar rate"

C est peut être pour ça qu’ils n’en parlent plus trop du vaccin